# Command Code scores three models on 3D SubwayBench

With the same /design prompt, Command Code gave DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 9/10 at $0.024, Mimo-V2.6-Flash 8/10 at $0.018, and Grok-4.7 3/10 at $0.35.

Language: en
Time zone: America/Los_Angeles
Current time (UTC, cached as of): 2026-11-10T06:08:00.000Z
Query date (America/Los_Angeles): 2026-11-09

HTML: https://didcodexreset.com/news/27a9de6ce6fe4d3b909d59e8.html

Content language: en
Localization state: sameLanguage

Source: Command Code · Published 9/22/2026, 19:54:23

Command Code tested Mimo-V2.6-Flash, Grok-4.7, and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on 3D SubwayBench using the same /design prompt.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scored 9/10 at $0.024 in one shot, which Command Code described as strong 3D UI/UX and gameplay. Mimo-V2.6-Flash scored 8/10 at $0.018 and produced a playable 2D result in about four iterations. Grok-4.7 scored 3/10 at $0.35; Command Code said its UI and gameplay were slower and needed more iteration.

Tags: Model evaluation, 3D SubwayBench, DeepSeek, Mimo, Grok

[View original post](https://x.com/CommandCodeAI/status/2102590815541600656)